advertisement
The Jammu and Kashmir government’s response to student protests in the aftermath of the Kathua rape and murder of temporarily shutting down educational institutions is worrying and distressing. J&K students have come in conflict with the police during these protests, and from central to south to north Kashmir, campuses have been converted into virtual battlefields. The pitched battles in streets between forces and students have resulted in injuries to hundreds of students across the Valley.
Every now and then, the government issues a diktat to close down educational institutions. This has obviously put these students’ careers at stake due to the disruption in their studies.
Today, I would like to hash out different dimensions of the same issue in the context of the prevailing situation. Many have been asking, ‘Why are students leaving their classrooms to pelt stones and indulge in hooliganism and violence despite authorities doing the needful to ensure justice is delivered?’
Now, before discussing the different dimensions of these incidents, let’s first agree upon a fact – protesting peacefully is a fundamental right and the state has no right to infringe upon it.
There are broadly two aspects to this particular problem in J&K:
The state doesn’t want students to come out, protest and express outrage. Both these dimensions need to be understood in their proper context. In the case of Kashmir, the second aspect seems to be the predominant and preponderant approach of the state in dealing with student uprisings. This is a reality that cannot be denied.
While the whole world is up in arms against the gruesome rape and murder of the 8-year-old- girl in Kathua, the state seems to be taking an unreasonable and imprudent approach in dealing with the peaceful protests. The state doesn't want students to raise their voice against injustice, tyranny and participate in the democratic setup. Students' power and their dominating the scene will challenge the state narrative and dump it, once and for all. Student activism has been viewed as a threat to the state.
A few days ago, in a viral video, a police man was seen hurling obscenities at women students in Anantnag. “I was walking when they threw stones at me and fired a tear gas shell in my direction,” the girl says in the video. “When I confronted him, he asked me to sleep with him.”
The girl said that the police were “provoking” the students to pelt stones.
In order to ensure that educational institutions are functional, the state should allow the students to protest without confronting them. The state should stop using force as a means to quell peaceful protest gatherings.
The larger narrative behind the protests revolves around the reaction to human rights abuses committed by the state forces, especially during the last few months. Dozens of civilians have been killed and hundreds injured near encounter sites. All these events revolve around the harbored sentiment and political aspirations and unfinished Kashmir dispute, all of which need to be addressed at the earliest.
Those at the helm of political affairs must understand that trying to contain the conflict will only prolong it, not resolve it.
(The author is a student of law at the Department of Legal Studies, Central University of Kashmir. He blogs at AbrarReyaz.wordpress.com and can be reached at abrar_reyaz@live.com. Views expressed are personal. The Quint neither endorses nor is responsible for them.)
(The Quint is now on WhatsApp. To receive handpicked stories on topics you care about, subscribe to our WhatsApp services. Just go to TheQuint.com/WhatsApp and hit send)
(At The Quint, we question everything. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member today.)