advertisement
A few weeks ago, Biju Janata Dal (BJD), the ruling party of Odisha, celebrated its 20th foundation day and with that, the unchallenged leadership of Chief Minister Naveen Patnaik, who has had a surprising impact on Odisha’s political life for the last 18 years.
In the last 20 years, Patnaik has established his leadership in a distinct manner, deviating from the norm. As is popularly believed, Patnaik was a reluctant politician initially and after being ‘forced’ to join politics, he continues to remain a political loner.
One can hardly see him interacting with the local media or making frequent public appearances. In fact, one can say he is a true political wonder, who has left politicians scratching their heads in their attempt to decode the formula behind his political success.
However, before the 2019 election, Patnaik is faced with a new challenge, that too from within his party. His rival is none other than his one-time confidante Baijayant Jay Panda. For the last few years, Panda and Patnaik have been engaged in a ‘cold war’, culminating in Panda’s suspension from the BJD about 10 days ago. Panda’s suspension was inevitable.
In his new avatar as a columnist, Panda has generously praised many policy decisions of the Modi government and is often seen hobnobbing with the right wing ‘elites’ in Delhi. Such was his association with the right wing camp that a journalist close to the Sangh Parivar once suggested on Twitter that PM Modi should appoint Panda to a Cabinet position. In November 2017 at a Columbia University event, renowned economist Professor Jagdish Bhagwati said:
While Panda’s persona as a ‘jet-setting’ politician and his elitist approach has drawn much criticism from within his party in Odisha, he is thought to have been more successful in New Delhi.
Basically, back home in Odisha he is largely seen as a corporate biggie who has no connection with ground realities.
In the meantime, there are two sets of reactions to Panda’s suspension in Odisha’s political circles. Those familiar with Patnaik’s politics are certain of Panda’s limited impact as a politician in the state.
Panda’s constituency of Kendrapara was the home turf of late Chief Minister Biju Patnaik. The voters of Kendrapara continue to respect Biju Babu and his legacy. On that count, it is easy to see that Panda was given the ‘safest’ constituency to sail smoothly in 2014. After his suspension, however, there seems to be no visible support for him from the party cadres from his home turf.
As it is well-known that Panda has a steady social media following, a strong PR team has been roped in by the Naveen Patnaik camp to do ‘damage control’ as and when necessary.
To strengthen the party, Patnaik has had to 'de-clutter’ – and removing Panda was part of that mission, according to political observers of the state. The BJD camp has been clear in its goal to attack Panda’s ‘businessman’ image, and in particular, has targeted his role as Vice-Chairman of the company Indian Metals & Ferro Alloys Ltd (IMFA).
Meanwhile, Panda’s strategy to counter BJD’s allegations against him appear to be calculated, and he does not seem to be in ‘attack mode’. Panda is yet to say a word against his party boss Naveen Patnaik. Instead of targeting Patnaik directly, Panda has been attacking the Chief Minister’s Office.
Perhaps Panda believes that attacking Patnaik may backfire due to the latter’s popularity, so he is taking an indirect route to upset the CM. Panda has openly rebuked one of the most powerful secretaries of the CMO. But the people understand only too well that a bureaucrat cannot counter Panda’s political attack, and using an IAS officer for settling a political score is indeed childish.
(The author is a Bhubaneshwar-based journalist and writer. He can be reached at @MishraKedar1. This is a blog and the views above are personal. The Quint neither endorses nor is responsible for them.)
(At The Quint, we question everything. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member today.)