advertisement
The aftermath of Pulwama terror attack has seen social media being filed prejudices, biases and hate. While one usually ignores a few trolls, when Kashmiri students are being allegedly threatened or a sitting Governor says he agrees with the call to boycott Kashmiri goods – it is time to ask questions.
It is time to ask whether the social fabric of India is being threatened by some who seek political advantage.
Meghalaya Governor Tathagata Roy sparked a controversy with his provocative comments on Tuesday, 19 February, endorsing a call to boycott all Kashmiri products from the state.
Speaking to BloombergQuint, Roy said his remarks were bound by the constitutional provisions of this country and that he was well within his legal boundaries to make such a statement.
When asked how this logic will help in tackling the core problem, Roy said, India has exhausted all possible options and that this non-violent measure is the way forward.
Meanwhile, President of Swaraj India Yogendra Yadav put forth a three point suggestion to deal with the issue.
Elaborating his three point suggestion, he said, “The first approach is for the government to take the Opposition leaders into confidence about its overall approach, not necessarily the operational details.”
While Modi and Rahul Gandhi have been mature with their statements, Amit Shah and many other BJP leaders have turned funeral processions into election roadshows, he said.
Condemning the coverage by media and response of people on social media platforms he said, there has been a lot of very irresponsible thought and trolling which has sunk to unexpected low levels and ground threats.
Former interlocutor on Jammu & Kashmir MM Ansari criticised both the central and Jammu and Kashmir government for the incident.
(At The Quint, we question everything. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member today.)