advertisement
There has not been any aspect where India have not established undisputed superiority at the 2023 ICC World Cup. Topping every chart – from the league stage points table to that of the leading wicket-takers and run-scorers – India were the first team to qualify for Sunday’s (19 November) final.
The second entrant – Australia – was, however, a surprise, but only if one is to judge by the disastrous start of their campaign. For, if we are to look at history and records, the five-time champions have always found a way to the top, having featured in seven of the previous 12 finals.
Ahead of the match, which has every reason to be a battle par brilliance, let us have a look at the five intrinsic player battles which could decide the outcome. And subsequently, of course, the destination of cricket’s most prestigious trophy.
Josh Hazlewood might have trapped Rohit Sharma leg before wicket on a duck in the last meeting, but that was his first success against the Indian skipper – after four unsuccessful attempts. Pat Cummins has not been very effective against Rohit either, having dismissed him only twice in 16 ODI meetings.
The opening batter has been dismissed thrice by the left-arm pacer in ODIs – the last of such an occurrence taking place only a few months ago.
Considering how Rohit being at his aggressive best – as testified by his strike rate of 124.15 – has propelled India to accumulate ginormous totals, it seems certain that he will take on Australia’s new-ball bowlers in the final. On the flip side, however, this presents Starc with an opportunity to get Rohit’s wicket for the fourth time.
Why did Australia succumb to a defeat in the league stage fixture against India? Because of Virat Kohli & KL Rahul’s 165-run partnership, sure, but before that, Mitchell Marsh handed Kohli a reprieve by dropping his catch when the talismanic batter had only 12 runs to his name.
Who was the bowler? Josh Hazlewood – who did get Kohli out later on – but at a time when the match was all but out of Australia’s grasp.
Considering his form, the man who has 50 ODI hundreds is very unlikely to be intimidated by any bowler. But against Hazlewood – who has been Australia’s most successful bowler against Kohli – will he be a tad inhibited?
Albeit the target was only 200, KL Rahul took the attack to leg-spinner Adam Zampa on 8 October’s match, scoring 29 runs in 25 deliveries. The approach was important for a couple of reasons.
Firstly, with the team recuperating after a nightmarish start, it was important not to let Zampa – Australia’s solitary spinner in the bowling arsenal – offer any joy.
But from the macrocosmic perspective, it was a battle of supremacy for Rahul, after being troubled by the spinner on previous occasions. Prior to that match, Zampa had dismissed Rahul on four occasions, whilst conceding only 109 runs.
Indian pacers have wreaked havoc with the new ball, but on that 8 October match against Australia, they could pick only one wicket in the first 16 overs. A major reason behind this was David Warner’s resilience.
But like Starc for Rohit Sharma, Mohammed Shami has been Warner's kryptonite. He has been dismissed thrice in ODIs by the seamer – who will be high on confidence after a seven-wicket haul in the semi-final – and averages only 34.3.
Glenn Maxwell has a bizarre, my-way-or-the-highway batting approach against Kuldeep Yadav. He has scored 99 runs in only 69 deliveries against the left-arm wrist spinner in ODIs, at a spectacular strike rate of 143.5. This highlights his longing for unleashing the unorthodox shots in his repertoire against Kuldeep.
Yet, he has also been dismissed thrice by the spinner, highlighting Maxwell has often paid a hefty price for his approach. With the batter not expected to change his approach overnight, this battle can range from reckless disaster to ravaging success for both players.
(At The Quint, we question everything. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member today.)