advertisement
The sexual assault case against a fake antique dealer, Monson Mavunkal, has triggered a political controversy in Kerala. But what happened?
On Saturday, 17 June, the Ernakulam POCSO court in Kochi sentenced Mavunkal to life imprisonment after he was found guilty of repeatedly raping a 17-year-old girl.
The minor who was sexually abused by Mavunkal is the daughter of his former domestic help. A fine of Rs 5.25 lakh was imposed on the accused under various sections of the POCSO Act.
Monson Mavunkal is a conman and alleged illegal antique dealer from Kerala.
He was arrested in September 2021, on charges of financial fraud as he was accused of cheating Rs 10 crore from different people in Kannur. According to police records, Mavunkal’s palatial residence that is partly converted into a museum, houses some of his 'precious' fake antiques – a throne said to have been used by Tipu Sultan, staff of Moses, silver coins claimed to have been given to Judas for betraying Jesus, a huge collection of old Qurans, Bibles, and old handwritten copies of the Bhagavad Gita, Gulfnews reported.
According to the prosecution, the survivor’s mother and brother were employed at Mavunkal’s firm. The abuser took advantage of the survivor's financial plight and pretended to offer help with her higher education. He then raped the girl while she was staying in his house at Vylopilly Lane and threatened her not to reveal the offence she was subject to. According to reports, when the survivor became pregnant in October 2019, following which Mavunkal had also forced her to abort the pregnancy and continued to sexually exploit her.
Ever since his arrest in 2021, Mavunkal is serving his jail term.
But why has a case pertaining to the alleged fake antiques dealer and a convict in the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act raised a political storm in Kerala?
A day after Monson was sentenced for life imprisonment, on Sunday, CPI(M) state secretary MV Govindan triggered a controversy when he cited the party's Malayalam mouthpiece Deshabhimani, to accuse KPCC president K Sudhakaran of being present at Monson Mavunkal's house while he sexually assaulted the minor girl. Govindan alleged that statement against the accused has been recorded by the survivor under Section 164 of CrPC.
Political war erupted between Congress and CPI(M) with Sudhakaran dismissing Govindan's statement's as baseless claims. He also stated that it was a “political move” and condemned the levels to which CPI(M) would stoop, South First reported.
“The evidence of the plot to concoct a false testimony against me will emerge in the public domain soon,” he said.
(At The Quint, we question everything. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member today.)
Published: undefined