advertisement
(This article was originally published on 23 July 2017. It is being republished to mark the World Press Freedom Day on 3 May.)
The police came in the early hours. Everyone was asleep. It was twilight.
Thirteen journalists’ homes were raided in the early hours of 31 October. The Editor-in-Chief of the newspaper lived in one. The CEO in another. Columnists in four, lawyers in three, the reporter, the ombudsman, the books section editor, the cartoonist, the accountant...
All were senior figures in the Cumhuriyet, Turkey’s oldest and most prestigious newspaper.
Trying to reassure their terrified, bleary-eyed children, they were forced to watch as their homes and archives were turned inside out and computers were impounded. They were taken to the main police station first, then to the hospital for a medical, and finally to the biggest prison in the country. They were placed in solitary cells, with no idea what their crime was.
Which organisations, I hear you ask?
The very same PKK (Kurdistan Workers’ Party) that the government had shared a peace table with three years previously, and the Gülenists that the government had jointly been ruling the country with for a decade.
Funnily enough, the risks posed by the Gülen movement had been flagged by these journalists, who were now accused of being Gülenists.
The reports, interviews, headlines, tweets and columns critical of the government seem to be it. In other words, they would be tried on charges of journalism.
I, as the former Editor-in-Chief, was the number one defendant. And I was charged with altering the newspaper’s editorial policy. My first reaction was to exclaim “So what?” Since when did prosecutors determine editorial policy for newspapers, anyway?
Last year, Turkey’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan embarked upon a sweeping crackdown, accusing his former partner Gülen of masterminding the 15 July coup attempt.
This was a ‘God sent’ opportunity to get rid of his opponents once and for all even as he purged the civil service of the Gülenists he had personally installed.
Having secured absolute power with a declaration of a state of emergency on 20 July, he then constitutionalised this de facto regime through a referendum held under ‘civil’ martial law conditions – an amendment rejected by half the nation, all the restrictions and controversial Electoral Commission practices notwithstanding.
In the wake of the coup attempt, the number of journalists in prison quadrupled from 30; as the Cumhuriyet contingent joined the 120, Turkey became ‘the world’s biggest prison for journalists.’
The Constitutional Amendment elevated Erdoğan to the position of one man; one man to rule the government, the Parliament and the judiciary and in charge of the mechanism that appoints judges and prosecutors.
Even the tea boy who runs the cafeteria was arrested; his crime being a gripe, ‘I wouldn’t serve Erdoğan tea if he came here!’ overheard by the police constable on duty at the paper, who informed his superiors. Lo and behold! The next morning our tea boy was taken into custody on a charge of “insulting the President.”
The Cumhuriyet is scheduled to appear in court on the 24 July. The entire editorial team of a newspaper is scheduled to face a judge for the first time after 267 days. They will be defending not only themselves, but also free press, as well as a democracy that is fighting for its life in the hands of a despot.
If this is a coincidence, it certainly is an ironic one:
All our colleagues are invited.
(Can Dündar is the 2017 laureate of the Golden Pen of Freedom, the annual award of the World Association of Newspapers and News Publishers (WAN-IFRA). Awarded since 1961, the Golden Pen recognises the outstanding action, in writing or deed, of an individual, a group or an institution in the cause of press freedom.)
(At The Quint, we question everything. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member today.)