Members Only
lock close icon

'Caste Deep-Rooted Even After 75 Years of Independence': Allahabad High Court

"Parents still feel shy to get their son or daughter to marry inter-caste," the court said. What was the case about?

The Quint
Law
Published:
<div class="paragraphs"><p>'Caste Deep-Rooted Even After 75 Years of Independence': Allahabad High Court</p></div>
i

'Caste Deep-Rooted Even After 75 Years of Independence': Allahabad High Court

(Photo: allahabadhighcourt.in)

advertisement

Caste-based discrimination is so deep-rooted in Indian society that families still continue to be against inter-caste marriages, the Allahabad High Court observed recently.

"This is the clear case of our society's dark face, where the families still feel shy to get their son or daughter to marry inter caste. The court after hearing the parties, records its deepest anguish, whereby this social menace is so deep rooted that even after 75 years of independence, we are fighting the cases with his opponents on this score only," the court said.

The case:

  • The court was hearing a plea filed by a woman and her accused-husband (belonging to a scheduled caste) who sought quashing of the chargesheet filed against the husband

  • The chargesheet was filed under Sections 363 (kidnapping), 366 (compelling to marriage) of Indian Penal Code, and Section 7/8 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO Act)

  • The wife's father filed the FIR against the husband in February 2019. He had alleged that the accused had enticed his minor daughter

  • However, the judge observed the father was going ahead with case despite the daughter marrying the accused voluntarily only because this was an inter-caste marriage

  • The lawyer representing the couple argued that the only legal loophole was that the girl was only 17 years old at the time of marriage

  • The Court has said that the father should have withdrawn the complaint for the sake of his daughter's future

What next? The High Court has asked the woman's father to appear before it on the next date of hearing and also stayed the proceeding with stemming from the chargesheet.

The case will be taken up next on 28 April.

(At The Quint, we question everything. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member today.)

Become a Member to unlock
  • Access to all paywalled content on site
  • Ad-free experience across The Quint
  • Early previews of our Special Projects
Continue

Published: undefined

ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL FOR NEXT