advertisement
Consider the following scenario. A person donates Rs 15,000 of his black money, in invalidated Rs 500 and Rs 1,000 currency notes, to a political party. The party deposits the currency in its bank account, claiming that the donation was made before 8 November. Soon after, let’s say during an upcoming state election, the person bills the party for services provided worth Rs 7,500 and the party pays from its account.
Now, the person and the party each have Rs 7,500 as legitimate income without having to pay tax on it or being compelled to participate in an income disclosure scheme.
While speaking to BloombergQuint, he said that the exemption given to political parties from disclosing names of those donating less than Rs 20,000, combined with the tax exemption to the parties, could be counterproductive to the anti-black money drive unleashed by demonetisation.
While these caveats are meant to serve as a safeguard against the unchecked flow of unaccounted income into the bank accounts of these parties, most political parties claim to receive over half of their income in anonymous donations of less than Rs 20,000 instead, the ADR found.
In the case of some parties, anonymous donations make for almost all their funding, says economist Ajit Ranade, who has also studied political funding and analysed disclosures of various political parties.
The confusion started on Friday, 16 December, when Finance Secretary Ashok Lavasa reportedly said that political parties are "exempted under Income Tax law to deposit old currency notes in their bank accounts,” as reported by The Indian Express.
Lavasa’s comments validated Chkokar’s fears. Subsequent statements from the tax department did not deny that political parties can continue to accept Rs 500 and Rs 1,000 currency notes up to 30 December.
As the matter threatened to snowball into a major controversy, Finance Minister Arun Jaitley clarified, on 17 December, that political parties were not permitted to accept invalidated currency after 8 November.
Jaitley’s statement sought to reassure that political parties will not be spared income tax scrutiny, but Chhokar remained unconvinced.
There are more than 2,000 political parties in India and more than 90 percent of these parties do not contest elections, implying that they have been formed for non-electoral purposes, which raises questions about their financial propriety, he said.
Ranade added that political parties are largely governed by the Election Commission of India, and that too only during an election.
But Nalin Kohli, spokesperson of the Bharatiya Janata Party insists political parties will not find it easy to game the system.
That may be true but it can also be rendered ineffective by how political parties are often late in filing financial information. The ADR report indicates that for the financial year 2014-15, only three national parties filed their annual returns on time - the Communist Party of India, the Communist Party of India (Marxist) and the Bahujan Samaj Party. The other three, the Nationalist Congress Party, the BJP, and the Indian National Congress, filed two to four months late. Many smaller parties may be tardier, and without data, there can be no scrutiny, fear activists like Chhokar.
On 18 December, the Election Commission called for an amendment to the Income Tax law to ban anonymous contributions to political parties for amounts more than Rs 2,000, as reported by PTI.
Chhokar added that the best way to ensure transparency in political funding is to bring political parties under the ambit of the Right to Information Act.
(Read the original story on BloombergQuint)
(With inputs from The Indian Express.)
(At The Quint, we question everything. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member today.)