advertisement
Ahead of Diwali this year, like every year, brands are all set to market their products of 'selling happiness in a bundle'. However, apart from the marketing pattern of brands, the act of banishing “controversial” ads and boycotting brands seems to have become a part of that routine.
The latest to fall victim to the pattern of “hurt sentiments” is Fabindia, after they released an ad featuring their new collection, titled, ‘Jashn-E-Riwaaz’.
BJP Yuva Morcha president Tejasvi Surya criticised the Fabindia ad and said in a tweet that the apparel brand, “must face economic costs for such deliberate misadventures”. Surya has riled up controversies previously, during the second COVID wave with the BBMP bed scam controversy and has often made ‘objectionable comments’.
Surya also said, “Deepavali is not Jash-e-Riwaaz. This deliberate attempt of abrahamisation of Hindu festivals, depicting models without traditional Hindu attires, must be called out.”
Even as #BoycottFabIndia began to trend on Twitter, some netizens, however, came out in favour of Fabindia, claiming the boycott to be "beyond ridiculous".
Over recent years, India has been witness to a rise in such calls for boycott of brands.
Last month, on 18 September, the bridal wear brand Manyavar Mohey released a commercial featuring Alia Bhatt, which received mixed reactions from netizens. Ranging from accusations of ‘anti-Hindu’ sentiment to others applauding the ad’s ‘progressive message’.
Those trolling Tanishq claimed that the ad promoted 'love jihad'. Soon after the social media storm, Tanishq took down the video from all its social media platforms.
In 2019, HUL's Surf Excel was similarly targeted for a Holi ad that promoted Hindu-Muslim harmony. The backlash was quite similar — #BoycottSurfExcel, cancelled Surf Excel orders, accusations that the ad promoted 'love jihad' and showed the Hindu festival in a negative light went around.
(At The Quint, we question everything. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member today.)