advertisement
“Why cut down trees when you can transplant them elsewhere”, was what the social media was abuzz with, when protests took over the streets of Mumbai over felling of trees in Aarey Milk Colony a few months ago. As many as 461 trees were to be transplanted from Aarey for the Metro 3 Project by the Mumbai Metro Rail Corporation Limited (MMRCL).
The felling of trees was stayed by the Supreme Court on the back of the protests.
At the same time, 1,066 trees were transplanted into the Aarey Milk Colony as part of the metro project.
Now, a court-appointed team inspecting the transplantation efforts in the Metro 3 project has found that 684 of these 1,066 have already died, tree activist Zoru Bhathena told The Quint.
This means 64 percent of the plants transplanted into Aarey have died.
The MMRCL Metro 3 project runs from Colaba to Andheri and is different from the metro car shed project planned inside the Aarey colony.
While the panel was supposed to submit the report to the court, the MMRC also confirmed that out of a total 1,582 treed that were transplanted, 1010 trees died.
When asked why the MMRC decided to transplant over 1,500 trees, the organisation told The Quint:
The numbers from this report explains what experts in the field of ecology and conservation have been saying – that transplantation is not “viable alternative” to tree cutting.
According to Bengaluru-based ‘Tree Doctor’ Vijay Nishant, who was involved in relocating trees for a Bengaluru Metro project, not all trees can be transplanted.
Speaking to The Quint, Kanchi Kohli, Senior Researcher at the Centre for Policy Research, pointed that trees that have to be transplanted, have to be felled differently.
Multiple examples from Delhi, including the Pragati Maidan project in Delhi, further helps us that transplantation does not guarantee survival. An audit survey showed that only 36 of 1,713 trees –just 2.1 percent were actually found healthy enough to survive the translocation.
Trees are not to be seen as trees but as urban spaces that are not just ecologically important but also socially important, said Kohli, pointing that architectural design should adapt to the trees and not the other way around.
Echoing her, New Delhi Nature Society’s, Varhean Khanna says that urban spaces should, henceforth, be planned thinking that trees are not structures that can be felled or transplanted. The only option should be that they have to continue standing, he added.
(At The Quint, we question everything. Play an active role in shaping our journalism by becoming a member today.)